child protection CPS Fashion Headline India Medicine Watch Suranya Aiyar

Indian Mother and Attorney wins Award for Fight Against Child Protection Services and Children Civil Rights Abuse

norway steals kids

Lawyer Suranya Aiyar in Norway. Picture from Fb.

Feedback by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Well being Influence Information

We’ve got beforehand reported right here at Well being Impression Information how authorities in India at the moment are offering info to households planning to go to or work in america in serving to them to keep away from having their youngsters kidnapped by Baby Safety Providers.

The Sunday Guardian reported:

Younger Indian couples travelling to america on brief to mid-term job assignments are more and more dealing with the menace of kid confiscation by the nation’s baby safety businesses, who wrongly accuse them of abuse. The “baby abuse” is decided utilizing the controversial Shaken Child Syndrome (SBS) indicator, the veracity of which is contested.

Suranya Aiyar, a New-Delhi based mostly lawyer, who has been offering counsel and help to Indian households within the US, Norway and different nations to assist them get again their confiscated youngsters, just lately submitted a “Report on Indian and India-Origin Youngsters Confiscated by the USA Youngster Safety Businesses” to the Ministry of Exterior Affairs.

Based mostly on her in depth case research of 12 Indian households, who have been falsely accused of kid abuse, her report sheds mild on the US businesses’ many biases and flawed methodology. The report needs a journey advisory to be issued to younger Indian households shifting to the US of potential confiscation of their youngsters as, generally, the sufferer households usually are not conscious of what may goad the kid safety businesses to provoke motion towards them.

Final yr (2018) Indian mom and lawyer Suranya Aiyar was awarded a laureate by the Nordic Committee for Human Rights (NCHR).

NCHR is a human rights group specializing in advocacy towards wrongful baby removals by baby safety businesses in Nordic nations.

In her acceptance speech, lawyer Aiyar appeals to policymakers in India to withstand and reject the Western fashions of kid safety.

Such is the unhappy state of affairs right here within the U.S. at the moment, the place attorneys and coverage makers in different nations should concern journey advisories and warn towards youngster kidnappings by American youngster safety businesses.

Alfies army

Picture from Fb.

by Suranya Aiyar
Sunday Guardian Reside

Good afternoon and greetings from India to all of you!

Let me start by saying how touched and honoured I’m to obtain this award from the Nordic Committee for Human Rights.

Wanting on the listing of my fellow laureates, previous and current, I’m doubly honoured.

These are individuals who have completed so much, and typically at nice value, in exposing the wrongful snatching of youngsters by the state in several elements of the world.

For me to seek out this endorsement of my work amongst you overseas, to have gained your belief and your friendship could be very gratifying. There are solely a handful of us in every nation preventing for justice towards baby safety providers or “CPS” as we name them.


I consider that if we work collectively, then we’ll ultimately achieve persuading the general public, our governments, and worldwide organisations that CPS in its current type has failed.

That is essential not simply in your nations, but in addition in my a part of the world.

Right here in India, UNICEF, Save the Youngsters and billionaire philanthropist organisations have been lobbying our governments and public influencers to undertake this similar mistaken mannequin of kid safety.

If CPS can go so fallacious, turn out to be so corrupt and power-mad in your nations regardless of your celebrated methods of public accountability, you possibly can think about the havoc they might wreck in mine.

It should not occur, and you need to assist us forestall it. It’s essential to assist us in India save our 440 million youngsters, and their principally easy, humble mother and father, nearly all of whom reside in very troublesome circumstances already, and whose solely pleasure is their youngsters.

You should assist us cease CPS from poisoning their lives right here.

In a method you’re already serving to. Your work, exposing the issues with CPS in your nations, helps us persuade individuals right here in India to reject this technique.

For those who win towards CPS in your nations, then we win towards CPS right here. So in a really actual sense we’re all on this collectively, and we should always be a part of palms internationally in preventing CPS.

All of us agree that baby abuse is fallacious and ought to be punished.

However due course of needs to be adopted. With out due course of, you’re on the mercy of state authorities—and that’s what makes the distinction between a democratic and an undemocratic system.

Due course of and a wholesome skepticism of all authorities authority are the distinguishing options of a free society.

However all skepticism appears to fade whenever you begin asking individuals about baby safety businesses.

What’s the cause for this blind spot within the public eye? I feel that they merely don’t consider that baby safety businesses are violating primary human rights; that baby safety investigations and trials are unfair and biased and youngsters are being taken from their mother and father with out good cause.

So what can we do about this? I consider we have now to do extra to point out the general public that baby removals are happening for causes falling far in need of any widespread understanding of abuse.

That youngsters are being taken even the place there isn’t any bodily or sexual abuse, and no difficulty of drug or alcohol habit. We’ve got to point out, that judges are ordering removals even once they say, in so many phrases, that the youngsters are beloved by their mother and father and haven’t confronted any abuse or abandonment by them.

To persuade individuals, we’d like the details about non-physical/sexual abuse removals to return from the federal government itself. I imply removals comparable to these for “danger of future emotional hurt”, “attachment dysfunction” and poverty-related assessments of neglect.

Let governments come clear on youngster safety instances that don’t contain bodily or sexual abuse, or parental drug or alcohol habit.

We now have some clues from the official knowledge that many, if not most, baby safety instances, don’t contain bodily or sexual abuse.

In Norway, Bufdir’s newest report says that “mother and father’ lack of care talents” and “excessive diploma of battle within the residence” are the 2 most frequent causes for youngsters and the younger to return into the kid welfare system.

However “parental lack of care talents” can imply something. The official knowledge has to offer us extra particulars to be significant. If none of those instances of “parental care talents” instances contain abuse, then the federal government must say so.

We’re informed that CPS intervenes solely in probably the most critical instances, however I’ve seen figures from Statistics Norway up to now, the place the annual proportion of bodily abuse and sexual abuse was as little as 1.eight% and zero.6% of the brand new instances.

If the identical sample exists for care orders, and never only for the initiation of instances, then we’re taking a look at a state of affairs of widespread removals for non-physical or sexual-abuse causes.

This locations the entire youngster safety enterprise on a completely totally different footing to what governments are telling the general public—that that is reserved for excessive instances of abuse.

So we have to mobilise a requirement in Norway for significant official statistics concerning the causes for putting youngsters in care.

For the statistics to be significant, and this is applicable to all nations (not simply Norway), there ought to be a separate heading for the variety of instances the place there isn’t any allegation of sexual or bodily abuse.

There must be a separate heading for the variety of instances involving drug or alcohol habit. There ought to be clear figures of the instances of separations which are achieved on purely psychological assessments like attachment dysfunction or emotional hurt.

Within the bodily abuse class, the figures ought to state what number of instances concerned spanking or different delicate types of bodily intervention, and what number of concerned critical violence. These information will converse for themselves, they usually should come from the mouth of the federal government.

In England, there are not any official numbers on the youngsters taken for “danger of future emotional hurt” or “mother and father’ failure to co-operate with social staff”.

That is very deceptive, as a result of we’re seeing care orders the place these are the given causes for putting youngsters in care.

When you take a look at the numbers in England for youngsters topic to a “baby safety plan” [the step prior to taking a child into care]bodily abuse instances are at 6% and falling, and sexual abuse instances are at four% and falling, whereas emotional abuse and neglect instances are at 30-40% and rising for annually since 2012.

This exhibits a a lot higher variety of emotional abuse than bodily or sexual abuse instances.

If in England, the sample for “taken care of” youngsters is similar as that for youngsters topic to a “baby safety plan”, then once more we’re taking a look at a state of affairs, the place the drastic motion of completely confiscating youngsters from their households shouldn’t be happening in conditions that the general public usually assumes it does—akin to incest, violence or abandonment—however for the far more questionable classes of emotional abuse and neglect.

We see an identical state of affairs within the USA. US official figures for foster care present a comparatively small variety of instances, underneath the heads of sexual and bodily abuse—sexual abuse is at four% and bodily abuse at 12% of instances.

The overwhelming majority of instances—61%—are reported within the class of neglect. So once more, we’re taking a look at an enormous variety of instances, that don’t contain the type of bodily and sexual abuse that the general public assumes, can be the idea of kid confiscation by the state.

In England, the info for taken care of youngsters isn’t useful because it golf equipment all abuse and neglect instances collectively underneath a standard head referred to as “abuse or neglect”. 

However abuse can imply a variety of issues, and so can neglect. For the info to be significant, abuse and neglect instances need to be separated after which they should have sub-categorised, in order that we will drill down and see what varieties of behaviors, incidents and residential circumstances, are being categorized by the authorities as abuse and neglect.

What these gaps within the official statistics present us is that the governments in all these nations that are so stubbornly defending their baby safety techniques, themselves don’t actually know what CPS is as much as.

They don’t know concerning the mushrooming emotional abuse and danger of emotional hurt instances. They don’t know concerning the sliding threshold for labeling one thing as bodily abuse or neglect. They usually don’t find out about neglect allegations arising from parental poverty. 

In Norway, the place the system is closely reliant on psychological assessments and the idea of attachment dysfunction, how can the federal government declare to have efficient oversight over Barnevernet when it doesn’t even have Attachment Dysfunction as a heading in its personal statistics about baby safety instances?

So I suggest we prioritise mobilising opinion on this concern and demand that authorities give clear knowledge on emotional hurt and neglect, damaged down into significant sub-categories as I’ve mentioned earlier.

I’ll cease right here as time is restricted. Thanks once more to the Nordic Committee for Human Rights for his or her award. I’ll cherish this and salute you from India.

To victims of CPS: all my love and solidarity. You aren’t alone. We bear witness to your struggling. We stand by you to the bitter finish.

To my beloved fellow activists, I want us all good battle! In the future victory might be ours. Thanks.

Suranya Aiyar is a New Delhi-based lawyer and mom. The International Youngster Rights and Mistaken collection is run in collaboration together with her web site, critiquing the position of governments and NGOs in childpolicy.

Learn the complete article at

Touch upon this text at

Medical Kidnapping: A Menace to Each Household in America T-Shirt


100% Pre-shrunk Cotton!
Order right here!

Medical Kidnapping is REAL!

See: Medical Kidnapping: A Menace to Each Household in America In the present day

Assist unfold the notice of Medical Kidnapping by sporting the Medical Kidnapping t-shirt!

Help the reason for, which is a part of the Well being Influence Information community.

Order right here!

If you realize people who find themselves skeptical and can’t consider that medical kidnapping occurs within the U.S. at present, that is the ebook for them! Backed with strong references and actual life examples, they will be unable to disclaim the plain proof earlier than them, and can turn into higher educated on this matter that’s destroying the American household.

Medical Kidnapping final

1 Guide – 228 pages
Retail: $24.99
FREE Delivery Out there!
Now: $14.99
Order right here!


2 Books
Retail: $49.98 (for two books)
FREE Delivery Out there!
Now: $19.99 (for two books)
Order right here!

Revealed on January 15, 2019

s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)(window, doc,’script’,
fbq(‘init’, ‘928755773879843’);

About the author