Fashion gardasil Headline HPV vaccine Medicine Watch

Statistics Show HPV Gardasil Vaccine Linked to Increased Cervical Cancer Rates After Years of Decline Due to Pap Smears

Dr. Nicole Delépine

Dr. Nicole Delépine

Contents

PARADOXICAL EFFECT OF ANTI-HPV VACCINE GARDASIL ON CERVICAL CANCER RATE

“How fantastic that we now have met with a paradox. Now we’ve got some hope of creating progress”. Niels Bohr (Nobel prized for his works on the construction of the atom and chemical reactions )

by Dr. Nicole Delépine, Oncologist, Surgeon
docteur.nicoledelepine.fr

Altering the pure historical past of most cancers that will increase in frequency and happens quicker.

It takes a very long time to affirm that a preventive motion actually protects. However the failure of this supposed safety can typically be in a short time apparent.

To show that the Titanic was really unsinkable would have required many years of navigation on probably the most harmful seas of the world. Demonstrating that it wasn’t, took just a few hours …

This » Titanic » demonstration is sadly reproduced by the Gardasil vaccination.

Proof that vaccination will increase the danger of invasive most cancers may be speedy, if the vaccine modifications the pure historical past of most cancers by accelerating it.

The evaluation of developments within the incidence of invasive cervical most cancers revealed in official statistics (registers) was studied within the first and most absolutely vaccinated nations (Australia, Nice Britain, Sweden and Norway). Sadly, it’s the case for HPV vaccines.

Pre-vaccination interval : spectacular success of cervical smear screening with a gentle lower within the price of invasive cervical most cancers. 

In all nations that carried out smear screening, the pre-vaccination interval from 1989 to 2007 was marked by a big lower within the standardized incidence of cervical most cancers.

In lower than 20 years, the incidence of invasive most cancers of the cervix decreased from :

13.5 to 9.four n Nice Britain [1]

13.5 to 7 in Australia[2] ,

11.6 to 10.2 in Sweden [3],

15.1 to 11 in Norway [4],

10.7 to six.67 within the USA [5],

11 to 7.1 in France.

Globally, within the nations that used smear screening, the typical annual price of decline was 2.5% between 1989 and 2000 and 1% between 2000 and 2007, leading to a complete lower of almost 30% throughout 1989-2007.

Period of vaccination: reversal of the development. Gardasil’s prevention failure erases the useful results of the smear and accelerates the onset of cervical most cancers. 

Since vaccination, in all of the nations carried out with a big vaccination program, there’s a reversal of the development, with a big improve within the frequency of invasive cancers in probably the most vaccinated teams.

Let’s take a look at OFFICIAL sources.

AUSTRALIA : opposite to the FAKE NEWS OF THE MEDIA AND POLITICS, REGISTER DOES NOT SHOW CANCERS OF THE CERVIX DISAPPEAR, BUT INCREASE.

Australia was the primary nation to arrange routine immunization for women (April 2007 school-based program for females aged 12–13 years, July 2007 time-limited catch-up program concentrating on females aged 14–26 years) after which for boys (2013).

In response to the final Australian Institute of Well being and Welfare publication (2018 publication describing the detailed charges till 2014 ) [6] , the standardized incidence within the general inhabitants has not decreased since vaccination 7/100000 in 2007 versus 7.four in 2014.

This international stabilization outcomes from two contradictory tendencies that solely seems by analyzing developments, based on age teams.

Vaccinated age teams ladies have seen their danger improve:

100% improve for these aged 15 to 19 (from zero.1 in 2007 to zero.2 in 2014)

113% improve (from zero.7 to 1.5) in teams aged 20 to 24 greater than 80% of them have been catch up vaccinated when 13 to 17 years previous.

However, because the figures are very small, this improve doesn’t attain statistical significance.

A few third improve for 25-29 group (from 5.9 to eight ,p=zero.06) and for 30-34 (from 9.9 to 12.four c=zero.80 p=zero.01) much less vaccinated. These will increase are statistically vital can’t be resulting from hazard.

A drama recognized to at least one prime athlete: Sarah Tait

This elevated danger of most cancers following vaccination was dramatically illustrated by the unhappy story of Sarah Tait, olympic rowing champion, on the 2012 London Olympics.

This champion noticed her life shattered in full glory : she suffered invasive cervical most cancers a couple of years later, being vaccinated and died at age 33. In fact, we don’t know if vaccination was the direct reason for her most cancers, however she has, statistically, a one in two probabilities of having suffered from a most cancers linked to vaccination (to be a part of the 113% improve of most cancers noticed after vaccination).

As well as, we comment that most cancers seems very early on this lady.

australia-cervical-cancer-rates

Non vaccinated ladies proceed to profit from screening with pap smear

Throughout the identical interval, older ladies (and subsequently unvaccinated) noticed their most cancers danger lower considerably:

much less 17% for ladies aged 55 to 59 (from 9.7 to eight.1),

much less 13% for ladies aged 60 to 64 ( from 10.three to eight.9),

much less 23% for these aged 75 to 79 (from 11.5 to eight.eight)

and even much less 31% for these aged 80 to 84 (from 14.5 to 10).

GREAT BRITAIN : THE PARADOXICAL EFFECT OF GARDASIL PROMOTING CANCER

In UK, a nationwide program was launched in 2008 to supply HPV vaccination routinely to 12-13-year-olds and supply catch-up vaccination to women as much as 18 years previous.

The UK nationwide program initially used the bivalent HPV vaccine (Cervarix), however, modified in 2012 to make use of the quadrivalent vaccine (Gardasil).

HPV vaccination protection in England has been excessive with over 80% of 12–13 years previous receiving the complete course protection. The catch-up cohort has been decrease coated (starting from 39% to 76%).

Because the vaccination, the standardized incidence within the general inhabitants elevated from 9.four per 100000 in 2007 to 9.6 in 2015. We observe contrasting tendencies between the age teams.

Vaccination promoters anticipated cervical most cancers charges lower in ladies aged 20 to 24 from 2014, as vaccinated adolescents enter their second decade.

Nevertheless, in 2016, nationwide statistics confirmed a pointy and vital improve within the price of cervical most cancers on this age group.

This info of 2016 has sadly not been publicized. They might have served as an alert.

Ladies aged between 20 and 25 years, vaccinated for greater than 85% of them, once they have been between 14 and 18 years previous, have seen their most cancers danger improve by 70% in 2 years (from 2.7 in 2012 to four.6 per 100,000 in 2014 p = zero.0006) and people aged 25 to 30, ( aged between 18 and 23 on the time of the vaccination marketing campaign) have seen their most cancers danger improve by 100% between 2007 and 2015[7] (from 11 / 100,000 to 22 / 100,000 ).

Ladies 25 to 34 years, (much less vaccinated, solely uncovered to some catch-up vaccinations), have seen their danger elevated by 18% (from 17 in 2007 to 20 in 2014).

In Nice Britain, as in Australia, older, unvaccinated ladies have seen their danger lower:

( -13% for ladies aged 65 to 79 and -10% for these over 80 ), probably as a result of continuation of smear screening.

UK-cervical-cancer-rates

SAME PARADOXICAL PHENOMENON OF GARDASIL IN SWEDEN : THE RATE OF CANCER INCREASES IN THE VACCINATED AGE GROUPS . ALERT!

In Sweden, Gardasil has been used since 2006. The vaccination program was rolled out in 2010, with vaccination protection of 12-year-old women approaching 80%. In 2012-2013, with a catch-up program, virtually all women aged 13 to 18 have been vaccinated.

On this nation, the standardized incidence of cervical most cancers within the international inhabitants has elevated steadily since vaccination from 9.6 per 100000 in 2006 to 9.7 in 2009, 10.three in 2012 and 11.49 in 2015[8].

This improve is usually because of the improve within the incidence of invasive cancers amongst ladies aged 20-24 whose incidence doubled ( from 1.86 in 2007 to3.72 in 2015 p<zero.zero01)[9] and in ladies aged 20 to 29 the incidence of invasive most cancers of the cervix elevated by 19% (from 6.69 to eight.01)

In distinction, as in Australia and Nice Britain, a lower within the incidence of invasive most cancers has been noticed in ladies over 50, a gaggle that has not been included within the vaccination program.

The incidence of invasive most cancers of the cervix decreased between 2007 and 2015 by 6% for ladies aged 50 to 59 (from 14.24 to 13.34), and four% for these aged 60 to 69 (12.63%). at 12.04,) 17% for these aged 70 to 79 (from 15.28 to 12.66) and 12% for these over 80 (from 15.6 to 13.68).

sweden cervical cancer rates

IN  NORWAY

Most cancers registry exhibits a rise within the standardized incidence of invasive most cancers of the cervix from 11.7 in 2007 to 12.2 in 2009, 13.2 in 2012 and 14. 9 2015 [10].

This improve is due -almost exclusively- to younger ladies, which embrace all vaccinated, as evidenced by the sharp decline of the typical age of onset of the cervix most cancers from 48 years in 2002 -2006 to 45 years in 2012-2016.

Between 2007 and 2015 , the incidence of invasive cervical most cancers elevated by eight% amongst ladies aged 20 to 29 (from 7.78 to eight.47)[11].

Throughout the identical interval, a lower within the incidence of invasive most cancers was noticed in older ladies, not concerned within the vaccination program: -11% for ladies aged 55 to 64 (15.47 to 13.7), -16% for these aged 65 to 74 (17.7 to 14.71) and -29% for these aged 75 to 85 (18.39 to 13).

In USA

On this nation, vaccination protection is decrease than in earlier nations (near 60%).

In accordance with the Most cancers Statistics Evaluation 1975-2015[12]the standardized incidence of invasive cervical most cancers stays secure(+zero.1) since vaccination.

In US, the identical discrepancy is noticed based on age teams, however of lesser amplitude. 

Ladies over 50, profit a 5% lower of their danger (from 10.37 per 100000 in 2007 to 9.87 in 2015), whereas youthful ladies, which embrace vaccinated, have given their danger improve of four% (5.24 in 2007 to five.47 in 2015).

WITNESS COUNTRY: FRANCE

The evolution of those nations, with excessive immunization protection, might be in comparison with the development noticed in metropolitan France, the place HPV vaccination protection could be very low (round 15%).

France could be thought-about, because of this, as a management nation.

In France[13] the incidence of cervical most cancers has steadily decreased from 15 in 1995 to 7.5 in 2007, 6.7 in 2012 and 6 in 2017, a lot decrease than these of nations with excessive vaccine protection.

This lower in incidence was accompanied by a lower in mortality from 5 in 1980 to 1.eight in 2012 and 1.7 in 2017.

It’s paradoxical and really worrying that these wonderful French outcomes, with low cervix most cancers price and low associated mortality, might be jeopardized by an obligation thought-about within the brief time period by our insurance policies, for some misinformed and different huge pharma hyperlinks[14].

DRAMATIC AND UNEXPECTED PARADOXICAL EFFECT OF GARDASIL: THE ALERT MUST BE GIVEN TO DECISION MAKERS AND THE MEDIA. 

In all nations that achieved excessive HPV vaccination protection, official most cancers registries present a rise within the incidence of invasive cervical most cancers.

For ladies beneath 20, the crude quantity are to small to succeed in statistical significance, however the same will increase in all of the studied nations constitutes a robust alarm sign.

For ladies 20-30 the incidence will increase after catch up vaccination, and is very vital (p<zero.01or zero.zero01). In these similar nations, throughout the identical interval, older ladies, not vaccinated, have seen their danger of cervical most cancers proceed to say no.

Equally, in metropolitan France, a rustic with low vaccination protection, the incidence of cervical most cancers continues to say no at a fee similar to the pre-vaccination interval.

These paradoxical outcomes plea for a speedy revision of suggestions and intensive analysis to elucidate this catastrophic difficulty.

Learn the complete article at docteur.nicoledelepine.fr.

Touch upon this text at VaccineImpact.com.

References

[1] Most cancers Analysis UK, Cervical Most cancers (C53): 1993-2015, European Age-Standardized Incidence Charges per 100,000 Inhabitants, Females, UK Accessed 08 [ 2018 ].

[2] AIHW [2]. 13. AIHW 2017. Most cancers in Australia 2017. Most cancers collection no. 101. Cat. No. CAN 100. Canberra: AIHW.

[3] NORDCAN, Affiliation of the Nordic Most cancers Registries three.1.2018

[4] Bo T Hansen, Suzanne Campbell, Mari Nygård Lengthy-term incidence of HPVrelated cancers, and instances preventableby HPV vaccination: a registry-based research in Norway BMJ Open 2018; eight: e019005

[5] Desk 5.1 Most cancers of the Cervix Uteri (Invasive) Tendencies in SEER Incidence and US Mortality SEER Most cancers Statistics Evaluation 1975-2012

[6] Australian Institute of Well being and Welfare (AIHW) 2017 Australian Most cancers Incidence and Mortality (ACIM) books: cervical most cancers Canberra: AIHW. .

[7] A Castanona, P Sasienia Is the current improve in cervical most cancers in ladies aged 20-24 years in

England a trigger for concern? Preventive Drugs 107 (2018) 21-28

[8] Nationellt Kvalitetsregister für Cervix most cancers prevention (NKCx), http://nkcx.se/templates/_rsrapport_2017.pdf [in Swedish] [9] Engholm G, Ferlay J, Christensen N, Hansen HL, Hertzum-Larsen R, Johannesen TB, Kejs AMT, Khan S, Olafsdottir E, Petersen T, Schmidt LKH, Virtanen A and Storm HH: Most cancers Incidence, Mortality, Prevalence and Survival within the Nordic Nations, Model eight.1 (28.06.2018). Affiliation of the Nordic Most cancers Registries. Danish Most cancers Society. Obtainable from http://www.ancr.nu, accessed it 30 / 09 / 2018 .

[10] Most cancers in Norway 2016

[11] Engholm G, Ferlay J, Christensen N, Hansen HL, Hertzum-Larsen R, Johannesen TB, Kejs AMT, Khan S, Olafsdottir E, Petersen T, Schmidt LKH, Virtanen A and Storm HH: Most cancers Incidence, Mortality, Prevalence and Survival within the Nordic Nations, Model eight.1 (28.06.2018). Affiliation of the Nordic Most cancers Registries. Danish Most cancers Society. Obtainable from http://www.ancr.nu, accessed is 1 / 10 / 2018

[12] SEER 9 Nationwide Middle for Well being Statistics, CDC

[13] Francim, HCL, Public Well being France, INCa. Projections of Most cancers Incidence and Mortality in Metropolitan France in 2017 – Strong Tumors [Internet]. Saint-Maurice: Public well being France [up to date02/01/2018;viewedonthe09/05/2018

[14] https://www.agoravox.fr/tribune-libre/article/gardasil-alerte-risque-imminent-d-206314 Gardasil, alert, imminent danger of obligatory vaccination towards HPV pointless, and typically harmful , for women and boys.

gardasil_collage-3

Illinois Teen Dies Three Weeks After Being Injected with HPV Gardasil Vaccine

California Nurse Provides Gardasil Vaccine to Personal Daughter who Develops Leukemia and Dies

Toddler By chance Vaccinated with Gardasil – Mom Blamed for Vaccine Accidents and Child Medically Kidnapped

The Joyful-go-Fortunate Woman I had Pre-HPV Vaccine is Gone Perpetually

Iowa Woman Faces Dying: Life Destroyed by Gardasil Vaccine

Gardasil Vaccine Given with out Consent and Ruins Lifetime of 14 Yr Previous Woman

After three Years of Struggling 19 Yr Previous Woman Dies from Gardasil Vaccine Accidents

Gardasil: The Choice We Will All the time Remorse

15 Yr Previous French Woman’s “Descent into Hell” After Gardasil Vaccine – Wheelchair Sure and Paralyzed

The Gardasil Vaccine After-Life: My Daughter is a Shadow of Her Former Self

Gardasil: An Expertise no Youngster Ought to Should Go By means of

I Need my Daughter’s Life Again the Approach it was Earlier than Gardasil

Gardasil Vaccine: Destroyed and Deserted

15-Yr-Previous Vaccinated by Pressure with Gardasil now Suffers from Paralysis and Ache

Recovering from my Gardasil Vaccine Nightmare

Gardasil: We Thought It Was The Proper Selection

“HPV Vaccine Has Accomplished This to My Baby”

13 Yr Previous World Championship Karate Scholar Pressured to Give up After Gardasil Vaccine

If I Might Flip Again Time, Korey Wouldn’t Have Acquired any Gardasil Photographs

What Docs Don’t Inform You: Our Gardasil Horror Story

Household Fights U.S. Authorities over Compensation for Gardasil Vaccine Accidents

Gardasil: When Will our Nightmare Finish?

HPV Vaccine Accidents: “I Can’t Start to Describe What it’s Wish to Watch your Daughter Reside in Such Agony”

Gardasil: Don’t Let Your Baby Develop into “One Much less”

The Gardasil Vaccine Modified Our Definition of “Regular”

Gardasil: I Ought to Have Researched First

“They’ve Been Robbed of Their Womanhood” – Native Milwaukee Media Covers Gardasil Vaccine Accidents

Gardasil: The Day Our Daughter’s Life Modified

Gardasil: The Determination I’ll All the time Remorse

Gardasil Vaccine: One Extra Woman Lifeless

Gardasil: A Father or mother’s Worst Nightmare

After Gardasil: I Merely Need my Wholesome Daughter Again

Gardasil: My Household Suffers with Me

Gardasil Modified my Well being, my Life, and Household’s Lives Perpetually

Gardasil: Ashlie’s Close to-Demise Expertise

Gardasil: My Daughter’s Worst Nightmare

My Private Battle After the Gardasil Vaccine

Gardasil: The Worst Factor That Ever Occurred to Me

A Ruined Life from Gardasil

HPV Vaccines: My Journey By means of Gardasil Accidents

The Darkish Aspect of Gardasil – A Nightmare that Turned Actual

Toddler Wrongly Injected with Gardasil Vaccine Develops Uncommon Type of Leukaemia

Dr. Andrew Moulden: Each Vaccine Produces Hurt

dr_andrew_moulden_every_vaccine_produces_harm

eBook – Out there for instant obtain.

Retail: $13.99
Now: $9.99

Order Right here.

Canadian doctor Dr. Andrew Moulden offered clear scientific proof to show that each dose of vaccine given to a toddler or an grownup produces hurt. The reality that he uncovered was rejected by the traditional medical system and the pharmaceutical business. However, his warning and his message to America stays as a strong legacy of the person who stood up towards huge pharma and their program to vaccinate each individual on the Earth.

Dr. Moulden died unexpectedly in November of 2013 at age 49.

Due to the robust opposition from huge pharma regarding Dr. Moulden’s analysis, we turned involved that the identify of this sensible researcher and his life’s work had almost been deleted from the web. His popularity was being disparaged, and his message of warning and hope was being distorted and buried and not using a tombstone. This ebook summarizes his educating and is a must-read for everybody who needs to study the “other-side” of the vaccine debate that the mainstream media routinely censors.

Learn Dr. Andrew Moulden: Each Vaccine Produces Hurt in your cellular system or pc by ordering the eBook!

 

rising-from-the-dead

Leaving a profitable profession as a nephrologist (kidney physician), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to truly assist remedy individuals. On this autobiography she explains why good docs are constrained inside the present corrupt medical system from training actual, moral drugs. FREE Delivery Obtainable! Order right here.

book-the-vaccine-court-by-wayne-rohde-large

Guide – The Vaccine Courtroom, by Wayne Rohde – 240 pages

“The Darkish Fact of America’s Vaccine Damage Compensation Program”

FREE Delivery Obtainable!

ORDER HERE!

Say NO to Obligatory Vaccines T-Shirt

vaccine-impact-t-shirt

100% Pre-shrunk Cotton
Order right here!

Make a Assertion for Well being Freedom!

Huge Pharma and authorities well being authorities try to move legal guidelines mandating vaccines for all youngsters, and even adults.

Present your opposition to pressured vaccinations and help the reason for Vaccine Influence, a part of the Well being Impression Information community.

Order right here!

Revealed on February four, 2019

!perform(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=perform()n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments);
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!zero;n.model=’2.zero’;
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!zero;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)(window, doc,’script’,
‘https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js’);
fbq(‘init’, ‘928755773879843’);

About the author

Admin